Site icon AsYourList.com

Judge Steven Merryday Strikes Down Trump’s $15 Billion Defamation Suit

U.S. District Judge Steven Merryday of the Middle District of Florida issued a blistering ruling on September 19, 2025, dismissing President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times and Penguin Random House for failing to meet Federal Rule 8’s requirement for a “short and plain” statement of claims.

Key Points of the Ruling

Judge Merryday found Trump’s 85-page complaint to be “decidedly improper and impermissible,” noting that:

“A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally” — Judge Merryday.

Judge’s gavel and scales of justice representing federal court action

Background and Context

President Trump filed the suit on September 15, 2025, accusing the Times of publishing falsehoods in articles about his leadership style, coverage of The Apprentice, and controversy surrounding his administration. The swift dismissal underscores the court’s insistence on procedural rigor, even for high-profile plaintiffs.

Judge Merryday, appointed by President George H. W. Bush in 1992, has a history of upholding clear standards for legal pleadings and previously issued significant injunctions against federal agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Silhouette of U.S. District Judge in federal courtroom

Implications and Next Steps

Judge Merryday’s ruling sets a clear reminder: even the most powerful litigants must follow the fundamental rules of civil procedure or face immediate dismissal.

Exit mobile version